🔗 Share this article

As the existentially challenged Tories meets in its conference city for its yearly gathering, it has plenty to consider regarding its next steps. Doubt remains if a road forward is available. These are difficult days for a governing group that now has little, if anything, fresh or distinctive to say to voters.

The Missed Opportunity

It could have been so different if concrete steps had been made on an policy focus that matters to people nationwide: Equal opportunity. But the previous administration lacked the slightest idea on how to convert his zeitgeisty rhetoric on social mobility into concrete action. Over twenty-four months after the general election, it argued over what the term even meant.

It seemed strange to me, because I had clearly defined for Johnson what social mobility meant when we originally talked about it during the contest for party leader. The phrase was a term I developed and used at the education ministry to talk about social mobility. It was our departmental mantra, and its purpose is clear: social mobility is the means by which we realize equality of opportunity – without removing chances away from those who possess it, but rather by providing opportunities to those that don’t.

Fundamental Idea

The other key education department term we used, “ability is distributed uniformly around the UK, yet chances are not”, served as a intentional wording, embodying the two halves of a equal opportunity plan. Initially, potential shared equally but not nurtured uniformly through our education system. Second, chances not distributed fairly by the private sector or our market. Therefore, education and business were essential to achieving improved equality of opportunity. This constituted an priority about the community framework of our country – supporting human talent and providing access to opportunities.

The Reality of Implementation

How did the social mobility agenda turn into under the Tory administration? A towns fund managed by the DLUHC. Street beautification and reconfigured roundabouts and roads. A white paper was launched almost thirty-six months after Johnson became leader, which saw current strategies repackaged under the fresh social mobility slogan.

Therefore, a broader social mobility agenda went undeveloped, as well as all the improvement that it might have driven – in capital, commerce, fiscal strategy, tax and in community development. Additionally, in education, including a tertiary education that has become a punchbag for politicians of all stripes – although it remains the strongest driver of upward movement for young working-class people, including myself, this country has had over the past 30 years. Maybe the sole mechanism of fair chances, functioning widely.

Why Hope Matters

Aspiration is essential for our country to succeed. For people to have aspiration, there needs to be a believable feeling that dedication and outcome are linked; that if people aim high, they can attain. For political leadership, being able to create a feeling of hope about the tomorrow is critical. Research by the academic institution at Bath University and others, recently released, showed that the ministry’s focus zones I introduced as education secretary – place-based approaches to improving education outcomes – led to youth in those areas being up to nearly one-fifth more optimistic about their prospects than those in comparable communities without these schemes in place. The evidence is clear: just making an sincere effort on fair opportunity strategies can quickly and positively change how people view their prospects.

Lost Potential

Unaware of these findings, and in the midst of its new leader election, in autumn 2022, the Conservative government ended the initiatives. Why should any person in those communities vote for a political group that made that decision? The targeted programme is one example of what might have become a game-changing administration strategy on social mobility, but that chance was completely wasted. Strategies such as this can inspire hope and aspiration. In contrast, as the Tories learned, failing to deliver of equal opportunity is the costliest mistake any government can make. Voters punished the administration for its incompetence but, perhaps most of all, for its unfulfilled commitments on equal opportunity.

Present Circumstances

Now the mandate on life chances and equal chances has been transferred to a new administration. The old slogan has been cast off. The new government has its own policy language of “eliminating hurdles to advancement”. The organization that is increasingly displacing the failing Tories, the challenger, also has its own message – “industrial revival”. This expression to talk about new opportunities in areas like the one I come from, in South Yorkshire. It claims that an former economic strength can reincarnate into an revitalized economy.

For voters, it must feel like a déjà vu experience. Identical problem, new terminology. Yet, currently, little improvement.

Lessons for the Future

Whether the government and opposition want to escape the identical outcome, both these parties should learn from the Tories’ mistakes on social mobility; that equal opportunity talk is easy to say, but effective implementation of fairer outcomes is much harder. Britain’s endemically weak equal opportunity remains the central problem for our country, with youth unable to get a good job beginning, those laboring in occupations with little to show after the living expenses are met, and citizens throughout the UK without any actual expectation their offspring will be able to do improve in life than they have.

Elected officials can discuss improved access repeatedly. However, which party has the party that has the comprehensive policy agenda on life chances? I observe no such party. Whichever party succeeds initially, prevails. Not only for their organization, but, significantly, for a whole country that has urgently needs equal access so badly.